Up to [ PhD Thesis in Brief ]
It should be no surprise to anyone who has completed a thesis that the experiment could be improved through further iterations. The future work chapter of my thesis describes some of the experiments that I'd like to do. In particular I think that the experiment should be rerun with a longer reading time, and that the readers should be selected with more care. Perhaps readers should be more interested in the topics of the article, or have high spatial ability.
I am more interested in pursuing the new interface and annotation parts of the future work. If you found those sections of the thesis interesting then you might be interested in the following interface projects too:
I was impressed with the graphical overview of webpages and the obvious importance placed on improving readers experience with online text when I saw the presentation at CHI'99 of The Reader's Helper: A Personalized Document Reading Environment (pp. 481 - 488).
From the abstract to the CHI'98 paper:
XLibris™ uses a commercial high-resolution pen tablet display along with a paper-like user interface to support the key affordances of paper for active reading: the reader can hold a scanned image of a page in his lap and mark on it with digital ink. To go beyond paper, XLibris™ monitors the free-form ink annotations made while reading, and uses these to organize and to search for information. Readers can review, sort and filter clippings of their annotated text in a "Reader's Notebook." XLibris™ also searches for material related to the annotated text, and displays links to similar documents unobtrusively in the margin.
I first saw XLibris at CHI'98 and then again at Hypertext '98. Bill Schilit has copies of some papers about the system available from his webpage.
Some papers about those projects are available from the ACM Digital Libary.
This document is copyright by its author, J. Blustein.