CSCI 4163/6610

Fall 2016

Tentative schedule and partial readings (L=lecture, T=tutorial, S=seminar)

Required readings with questions (to be submitted indicated with ** (Submit via Brightspace – details to follow) 1-2 questions per paper, i.e., 2 short snappy or 1 longer more thoughtful)

 

****ever under construction****

Type#

Date

Topics and Readings

Deliverables

Assigned

L0

Wed Sept 7

Syllabus

 

 

L1

Mon Sept 12

Overview: HCI & User centered contextual design processes

Required:

-       **Reading for Thursday, January 8th: Carroll, John M. (2013): Human Computer Interaction (HCI). In: Soegaard, Mads and Dam, Rikke Friis (eds.). "The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.". Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/human_computer_interaction_hci.html

 

Additional readings

-       http://www.upassoc.org/usability_resources/about_usability/what_is_ucd.html

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/methods.htm

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/context.htm

-       Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1999. Contextual design. interactions 6, 1 (Jan. 1999), 32-42. DOI

 

 

T0

Mon Sept 12

Brainstorm research questions for Mini Project 1

 

 

L2

Wed Sept 14

Quick overview of Methodologies, Surveys /Interviews

Required:

-       ** Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marc Hassenzahl, Arnold P.O.S. Vermeeren, and Joke Kort. 2009. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 719-728. DOI=10.1145/1518701.1518813 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.

Optional:

-       1518813Alex Braunstein, Laura Granka, and Jessica Staddon. 2011. Indirect content privacy surveys: measuring privacy without asking about it. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 15 , 14 pages. DOI=10.1145/2078827.2078847 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2078827.2078847

-       Benjamin M. Gross and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2007. Addressing constraints: multiple usernames task spillage and notions of identity. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2393-2398. DOI=10.1145/1240866.1241013 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240866.1241013

 

Additional resources:

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/surveys.htm

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/interviews.htm

 

Submit readings questions/comments for L1 and L2 by today (Moodle)

 

 

L3

Monday Sept 19

Interviews/Focus Groups

Required:

-       ** Jim Witschey, Emerson Murphy-Hill, and Shundan Xiao. 2013. Conducting interview studies: challenges, lessons learned, and open questions. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI '14). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 51-54. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2670000/2662544/p51-witschey.pdf

-       ** Karolien Poels, Yvonne de Kort, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2007. "It is always a lot of fun!": exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play (Future Play '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83-89. DOI=10.1145/1328202.1328218 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218

Additional resources:

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/focusgroups.htm

-       Sri Kurniawan, Murni Mahmud, and Yanuar Nugroho. 2006. A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 989-994. DOI=10.1145/1125451.1125641

T1

Mon Sept 19

Experimental Design tutorial – discussion of MP1 requirements

Required:

Ethics Tutorial (self-directed study on own time): Read the Dalhousie policy. Complete the TCPS tutorial.

-       http://www.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/research-services/Policy_on_the_Ethical_Conduct_of_Research_Involving_Humans__Approved_by_Senate_May_14__2012_.pdf

-       http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/education/tutorial-didacticiel

 

MP1 group formed

 

MP RQ chosen

MP1

Ethics tutorial

L4

Wed Sept 21

Observations

Required:

-       http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/userobservation.htm

-       ** Chek Tien Tan, Tuck Wah Leong, and Songjia Shen. 2014. Combining think-aloud and physiological data to understand video game experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 381-390. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2557326 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557326

Additional resources:

-       Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). "A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis". American Journal of Psychology (University of Illinois Press) 113 (3): 387–404. doi:10.2307/1423365

-       Phillip J. McClelland, Simon J. Whitmell, and Stacey D. Scott. 2011. Investigating communication and social practices in real-time strategy games: are in-game tools sufficient to support the overall gaming experience?. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011 (GI '11). Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 215-222 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1992953

L5

Mon Sept 26

Contextual Inquiry

Required:

-       **Alexander Meschtscherjakov, David Wilfinger, Nicole Gridling, Katja Neureiter, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. Capture the car!: qualitative in-situ methods to grasp the automotive context. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '11), Matthias Kranz, Garrett Weinberg, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Martin Murer, and David Wilfinger (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 105-112. DOI=10.1145/2381416.2381434 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2381416.2381434

Additional Resources

-       David R. Millen. 2000. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '00), Daniel Boyarski and Wendy A. Kellogg (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 280-286. DOI=10.1145/347642.347763 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/347642.347763

-        

Post McGrath handout

T2

Mon Sept 26

MP1: Interviews: semi-structured

 

-       Note: ALL students expected to attend and to take part in this and all other MP1 Exercises

-       Roles:

-       Researchers (MP1 groups assigned the methodology): Practice research protocol on participant volunteers. Post session: write up a reflection of what went well and did not go well and refine protocol for MP1 project. Include in your project binder.

-       Participant Volunteers: Act as a participant (feel free to make up a persona and act accordingly - be the bear!); at end of session, complete a quick rating sheet.

-       Observer: Observe the exercises when not acting as a participant volunteer; at end of session, complete a quick rating sheet.

- End of each tutorial – submit rating sheets (1 per each time being a participant volunteer, 1 for each group observed (summarize all observations for each group on 1 rating sheet)

Ethics tutorial completed & certificate submitted on Brightspace

 

MP1: Interview Groups pilot protocol

 

 

 

L6

Wed Sept 28

Diary studies

Required:

-       Advertising diary exercise (bring handout from Mon Sept 26 class)

-       **Carter, Scott and Mankoff, Jennifer, "When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies" (2005). HumanComputer Interaction Institute. Paper 123. http://repository.cmu.edu/hcii/123

Additional resources:

-       http://www.alistapart.com/articles/culturalprobe/

-       http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/horvitz/taskdiary.pdf

Seminar requirements

 

T3

Mon Oct 3

MP1: Focus Groups – (w/o activity) and (with activity)

MP1:

Focus Groups groups pilot protocol

 

 

Mon Oct 3

Invited Talk – Ryder Ziola (Google)

 

 

L7

Wed Oct 5

Mixed method approaches

Required:

-       **Lena Mamykina, Bella Manoim, Manas Mittal, George Hripcsak, and Bjorn Hartmann. 2011. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2857-2866. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1979366 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979366

Additional resources:

1.     Jeffrey Heer, Fernanda B. Viegas, and Martin Wattenberg. 2007. Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1029-1038. DOI=10.1145/1240624.1240781 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240781

Seminar Topic form completed with preferences

 

Give out A1 & A2

Mon Oct 10

Thanksgiving – university closed

 

 

L8

Wed Oct 12

Methodological Tradeoffs

-       **McGrath, J. (1994). Methodology matters: Doing research in the behavioural and social sciences. (BGBG 152-169) (pdf of paper posted in Brightspace Sept 26th)

 

 

L9

Mon Oct 17

Qualitative Analysis

Required:

-       **Melanie Tory and Sheryl Staub-French. 2008. Qualitative analysis of visualization: a building design field study. In Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization (BELIV '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 8 pages. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1377966.1377975

-       Qualitative data analysis tutorial: http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Methodology_tutorial_-_qualitative_data_analysis

Additional reading:

-       Lada Gorlenko and Paul Englefied. 2006. Usability error classification: qualitative data analysis for UX practitioners. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 803-808 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125451.1125610

-       Rodrigo Werlinger, Kirstie Hawkey, Kasia Muldner, Pooya Jaferian, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2008. The challenges of using an intrusion detection system: is it worth the effort?. In Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Usable privacy and security (SOUPS '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107-118. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1408664.1408679

-       Affinity Diagrams (aka K-J Technique) http://www.uie.com/articles/kj_technique

-       Sandelowski, M. (2000), Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res. Nurs. Health, 23: 334–340. http://www.wou.edu/~mcgladm/Quantitative Methods/optional stuff/qualitative description.pdf

-       Hudson, William (2013): Card Sorting. In: Soegaard, Mads and Dam, Rikke Friis (eds.). "The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.". Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Available online at http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/card_sorting.html

-       Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, April 22 - 27, 2006). R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, and G. Olson, Eds. CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 541-550.DOI

 

 

T4

Mon Oct 17

MP1: Contextual Inquiry ,  Diary

MP1:Contextual Inquiry and Diary groups pilot protocol

 

S1

Wed Oct 19

Models: cognitive load theory (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 1A: Memory (Harsha Gavicherla)

1.     Joshua Hailpern, Nicholas Jitkoff, Andrew Warr, Karrie Karahalios, Robert Sesek, and Nik Shkrob. 2011. YouPivot: improving recall with contextual search. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1521-1530.

2.     Abigail J. Sellen, Andrew Fogg, Mike Aitken, Steve Hodges, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81-90. DOI=10.1145/1240624.1240636 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240636

 

ST 2A: Cognitive Load Theory (Vaishali Kulkarni)

3.     Fang Chen, Natalie Ruiz, Eric Choi, Julien Epps, M. Asif Khawaja, Ronnie Taib, Bo Yin, and Yang Wang. 2013. Multimodal behavior and interaction as indicators of cognitive load. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 4, Article 22 (January 2013), 36 pages. DOI=10.1145/2395123.2395127 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2395123.2395127

 

ST 2A: Cognitive Decline (Connor Foran)

4.     Kirstie Hawkey, Kori M. Inkpen, Kenneth Rockwood, Michael McAllister, and Jacob Slonim. 2005. Requirements gathering with alzheimer's patients and caregivers. In Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 142-149. DOI=10.1145/1090785.1090812 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1090785.1090812

5.     Alethea Blackler, Doug Mahar, and Vesna Popovic. 2010. Older adults, interface experience and cognitive decline. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 172-175. DOI=10.1145/1952222.1952257 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1952222.1952257

 

 

 

 

S2

Mon Oct 24

Models: attention, perception, memory, cognitive load theory (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 3A: Attention (Glib Boytsun)

1.     E. Horvitz, C. M. Kadie, T. Paek, D. Hovel. Models of Attention in Computing and Communications: From Principles to Applications, Communications of the ACM 46(3):52-59, March 2003 http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/horvitz/cacm-attention.pdf

2.     Antti Oulasvirta, Sakari Tamminen, Virpi Roto, and Jaana Kuorelahti. 2005. Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 919-928. DOI=10.1145/1054972.1055101 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055101

 

ST 3B: Perception (Ruhi Madiwale)

3.     Ruth Rosenholtz, Amal Dorai, and Rosalind Freeman. 2011. Do predictions of visual perception aid design?. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 2, Article 12 (February 2011), 20 pages. DOI=10.1145/1870076.1870080 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1870076.1870080

4.     Anbang Xu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1433-1444. DOI=10.1145/2531602.2531604 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2531602.2531604

 

 

 

 

 

T5

Mon Oct 24

MP1: Questionnaires – (paper) and (delivered as structured interview)

MP1: Questionnaire groups pilot protocol

 

S3

Wed Oct 26

Fitts Law (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 13A: Traditional Fitts Law (TBA)

1.     Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 647-656. DOI

2.     MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces. (Reprinted in BGBG 483-493) online copy. (Elham Fami)

 

 

ST 13B: Fitts Law beyond the desktop (TBA)

1.     Xiaojun Bi, Yang Li, and Shumin Zhai. 2013. FFitts law: modeling finger touch with fitts' law. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1363-1372. DOI=10.1145/2470654.2466180 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2466180

2.     Garth Shoemaker, Takayuki Tsukitani, Yoshifumi Kitamura, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2012. Two-Part Models Capture the Impact of Gain on Pointing Performance. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 4, Article 28 (December 2012), 34 pages. DOI=10.1145/2395131.2395135 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2395131.2395135

 

 

L10

Mon Oct 31

Group presentation of MP1 results

Template to use to present initial findings can be found on Brightspace

Formation of breakout groups for each research question

 

 

T6

Mon Oct 31

Finish synthesis of results:

- Breakout groups for each RQ to compare results by method (30 min)

 

- Each group present results (15 min)

 

- Class discussion (20 min)

 

 

 

S4

Wed Nov 2

No class (day of action)

 

Participation activity

 

Complete the quiz at:

http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html

 

As you reflect upon the answers, think about the interfaces that you use. Write a couple of paragraphs about how you think Fitts Law has influenced those interfaces, or whether your see some places where the application of Fitts law might improve interactivity.

 

Submit by 11:35 am, Monday, November 14th on Brightspace.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nov 7-11

Fall Study Break

MP 1 final report + project binder due Monday at noon

 

S5

Mon Nov 14

Social Media (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 11A: Community and other positive aspects of Social Media (Samar Kordi – seminar postponed to Dec 5, readings kept as is)

1.     Cliff Lampe, Jessica Vitak, Rebecca Gray, and Nicole Ellison. 2012. Perceptions of facebook's value as an information source. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3195-3204. DOI=10.1145/2207676.2208739 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208739

2.     Moira Burke, Robert Kraut, and Cameron Marlow. 2011. Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 571-580. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1979023 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979023

 

ST 11B: Addiction and other negative aspects of Social Media(Tafazzul Hussain Mohammed)

1.     Eric P.S. Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D. Khovanskaya, Tony C. Liao, Madeline E. Smith, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Kaiton Williams. 2013. Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3257-3266. DOI=10.1145/2470654.2466446 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2466446

2.     Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 773-782. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2556983 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2556983

 

 

ST 12A: Identity (Ghazayil Alkhalifah – seminar postponed to Dec 5, readings kept as is)

1.     Frederic Stutzman and Woodrow Hartzog. 2012. Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 769-778. DOI=10.1145/2145204.2145320 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2145204.2145320

2.     Joan Morris DiMicco and David R. Millen. 2007. Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 383-386. DOI=10.1145/1316624.1316682 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1316624.1316682

 

ST 12B: Privacy (Steven Dancer)

1.     Mark W. Newman, Debra Lauterbach, Sean A. Munson, Paul Resnick, and Margaret E. Morris. 2011. It's not that i don't have problems, i'm just not putting them on facebook: challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 341-350. DOI=10.1145/1958824.1958876 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1958824.1958876

2.     Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Saranga Komanduri, Michelle L. Mazurek, Michael K. Reiter, Manya Sleeper, and Blase Ur. 2013. The post anachronism: the temporal dimension of facebook privacy. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM workshop on Workshop on privacy in the electronic society (WPES '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-12. DOI=10.1145/2517840.2517859 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2517840.2517859

 

 

 

 

 

T8

Mon Nov 14

Introduction to experimental design, Controlled Experiments and mini-project 2.

Read this chapter before the tutorial, which covers controlled experiments in HCI. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/14774/1/14774.pdf

 

 

Give out MP2

 

S6

Wed Nov 16

Interruptions (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 5A: Interruptions: the cognitive processes at work (Choudhury Mahmid)

1.     Dario D. Salvucci. 2010. On reconstruction of task context after interruption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89-92. DOI=10.1145/1753326.1753341 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753341

2.     Gluck, J., Bunt, A., and McGrenere, J. 2007. Matching attentional draw with utility in interruption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 41-50. (doi)

 

ST 5B: Interruptions: multi-tasking (Elliot Layne)

 

3.     Dario D. Salvucci, Niels A. Taatgen, and Jelmer P. Borst. 2009. Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1819-1828. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518981

4.     Jing Jin and Laura A. Dabbish. 2009. Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1799-1808. DOI=10.1145/1518701.1518979 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518979

 

 

ST 6A/B: Interruptions (WHEN to interrupt) (Darcy Fernando – seminar postponed to November 28th)

1.     Iqbal, S. T. and Horvitz, E. 2007. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 677-686. (doi)

 

ST 6B: Interuptions (HOW to interrupt)(Jon Ryan Coady)

2.     Julie S. Weber, Mark W. Newman, and Martha E. Pollack. 2009. Multi-format Notifications for Multi-tasking. In Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part I (INTERACT '09), Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotz, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_31 ( Hasmeet)

 

-        

S7

Mon Nov 21

Personalization + Colour Perception (submit questions/comments on any 1 of these readings + the Universal Usbility reading below) – Moved from Nov 2nd

 

ST 7A: Adaptable systems (Bray Shurman)

1.     Andrea Bunt, Cristina Conati, and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system?. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 117-124. DOI=10.1145/964442.964465 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964442.964465

2.     Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What drives customization?: control or identity?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781-790. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1979056 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979056

 

ST 8B: Adaptive systems (Mishal Alnajdi)

1.     Gajos, K. Z., Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., and Weld, D. S. 2006. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual interfaces (Venezia, Italy, May 23 - 26, 2006). AVI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 201-208.

2.     Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katherine Everitt, Desney S. Tan, Mary Czerwinski, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1271-1274. DOI=10.1145/1357054.1357252 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357252

 

ST 4A: Colour Perception (Omar Alahmadi – postponed to December 5th)

1.     Peter O'Donovan, Aseem Agarwala, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2011. Color compatibility from large datasets. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, Article 63 (July 2011), 12 pages. DOI=10.1145/2010324.1964958 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2010324.1964958

2.     Coursaris, Constantinos K., Sarah J. Swierenga, and Ethan Watrall. "An empirical investigation of color temperature and gender effects on web aesthetics." Journal of Usability Studies 3.3 (2008): 103-117. http://uxpajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/JUS_Coursaris_May2008.pdf

 

 

 

Universal Usability (submit questions/comments on the ** Wobbrock et al. reading below)

 

** Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27 pages. (doi)

 

 

 

 

ST15B: Hands-free (Ali Asghar Hashemi)

1.     Jackson Feijo Filho, Wilson Prata, and Thiago Valle. 2013. Pufftext: a puff controlled software-based hands-free spin keyboard for mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 468-471. DOI=10.1145/2493190.2494661 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2493190.2494661

2.     Zhihan Lv, Liangbing Feng, Haibo Li, and Shengzhong Feng. 2014. Hand-free motion interaction on Google Glass. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications (SA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 21 , 1 pages. DOI=10.1145/2669062.2669066 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2669062.2669066

 

 

A1 & A2 due

 

T9

Mon Nov 21

MP2: Breakout groups will design a between subjects study.

 

Discussion on strengths and limitations of between subjects designs.

S8

Wed Nov 23

Displays (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

NOTE: Field trip! This class will be held in the GEM lab, 4th floor of the Mona Campbell building (turn right when you get off the elevator)

 

ST 16A: Large Wall displays

1.     Nacenta, M. A., Sallam, S., Champoux, B., Subramanian, S., and Gutwin, C. 2006. Perspective cursor: perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, April 22 - 27, 2006). CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 289-298. (doi)

2.     Kirstie Hawkey, Melanie Kellar, Derek Reilly, Tara Whalen, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2005. The proximity factor: impact of distance on co-located collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31-40. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099203.1099209

 

ST 16B: Large Tabletop displays

1.     Anthony Tang, Michel Pahud, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Bill Buxton. 2010. VisTACO: visualizing tabletop collaboration. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces(ITS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 29-38. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1936652.1936659

2.     Morris, M. R., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T., and Stamberger, J. 2006. TeamTag: exploring centralized versus replicated controls for co-located tabletop groupware. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, April 22 - 27, 2006). CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 1273-1282. (doi)

3.     Mindy Seto, Stacey Scott, and Mark Hancock. 2012. Investigating menu discoverability on a digital tabletop in a public setting. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71-80. DOI=10.1145/2396636.2396647 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2396636.2396647

 

ST 17A: Small displays (tablet & smartphone)

1.     Julie Wagner, Stephane Huot, and Wendy Mackay. 2012. BiTouch and BiPad: designing bimanual interaction for hand-held tablets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2317-2326. DOI=10.1145/2207676.2208391 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208391

2.     Daniel Avrahami, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Shahram Izadi. 2011. Portico: tangible interaction on and around a tablet. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347-356. DOI=10.1145/2047196.2047241 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2047196.2047241

3.     Sebastian Boring, David Ledo, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Nicolai Marquardt, Anthony Tang, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. The fat thumb: using the thumb's contact size for single-handed mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39-48. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2371574.2371582

4.     Stefano Burigat, Luca Chittaro, and Andrea Vianello. 2012. Dynamic visualization of large numbers of off-screen objects on mobile devices: an experimental comparison of wedge and overview+detail. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93-102. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2371574.2371590 (LuiZ)

 

ST 17B: Holographic displays and Interactions (Juliano Franz)

1.     Henry Chen, Austin S. Lee, Mark Swift, and John C. Tang. 2015. 3D Collaboration Method over HoloLens and Skype End Points. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (ImmersiveME '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-30. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2814347.2814350 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2814350

2.     C. Schwede and T. Hermann, "HoloR: Interactive mixed-reality rooms," Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2015 6th IEEE International Conference on, Gyor, 2015, pp. 517-522. doi: 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2015.7390647 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7390647/

 

 

 

Give out A3

 

 

S9

Mon Nov 28

Interactions Natural User Interfaces (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 18: A: Input Gestures: swipe/pinch (Lucas Cameron & David McAskile)

1.     Alexander Kulik, Jan Dittrich, and Bernd Froehlich. 2012. The hold-and-move gesture for multi-touch interfaces. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49-58. DOI=10.1145/2371574.2371583 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2371574.2371583

2.     Aurelie Cohe and Martin Hachet. 2012. Understanding user gestures for manipulating 3D objects from touchscreen inputs. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2012 (GI '12). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 157-164. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2310000/2305303/p157-cohe.pdf?ip=134.190.157.22

3.     Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1285-1294. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255

 

 

ST 18: B: Interactions: Gestures (whole body) (Mimi Cahill)

4.     Garth Shoemaker, Takayuki Tsukitani, Yoshifumi Kitamura, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2010. Body-centric interaction techniques for very large wall displays. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 463-472. DOI=10.1145/1868914.1868967 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1868914.1868967

 

ST 19: A: Interactions: Gestures (On body) (Kristofer Pervin)

5.     Martin Weigel, Vikram Mehta, and Jurgen Steimle. 2014. More than touch: understanding how people use skin as an input surface for mobile computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179-188. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2557239 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557239

6.     Chris Harrison, Shilpa Ramamurthy, and Scott E. Hudson. 2012. On-body interaction: armed and dangerous. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12), Stephen N. Spencer (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69-76. DOI=10.1145/2148131.2148148 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2148131.2148148

 

 

ST 6A/B: Interruptions (WHEN to interrupt) (Darcy Fernando – seminar postponed from November 28th)

 

 

 

 

T10

Mon Nov 28

MP2: Breakout groups will pilot a between subjects study and then revise the protocol to a within subjects design.

 

Discussion on the pros/cons of within subjects designs.

 

L10

Wed Nov 30

Controlled studies continued - discussion of quantitative analysis

 

Quantitative Analysis

-        Mini-workshops on statistics at link:

-        Independent Versus Repeated t-tests

-       One-Way ANOVA (first six pages only, plus Bottom Line and Summary)

-       Two-Way ANOVA (first six pages only, plus Bottom Line and Summary)

S10

Mon Dec 5

ST 11A: Community and other positive aspects of Social Media (Samar Kordi – seminar postponed from Nov 14)

ST 12A: Identity (Ghazayil Alkhalifah – seminar postponed from Nov 14)

ST 4A: Colour Perception (Omar Alahmadi – seminar postponed from Nov 21)

 

NO NEW READINGS FOR TODAY

 

 

S11 (T11)

Mon Dec 5

MP2 breakout groups will pilot the within subjects study protocol. 

 

Discussion about which design was better for the research questions.

 

 

 

S12

Tues Dec 6

Experimental Design Wrap-up (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

 

ST 22A Experimental design - Minimizing bias – Demand characteristics – preference (TBA)

1.     Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. "Yours is better!": participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1321-1330. DOI=10.1145/2207676.2208589 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208589

 

ST 22B Experimental design - Minimizing bias – Demand characteristics – usage (TBA)

2.     Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1657-1666. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1979185 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979185

 

 

ST 23A: Experimental design: futuristic design (TBA)

3.     Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A.K., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A., Price, B., Thomas, K., Nuseibeh, B. (2010). Contravision: Exploring users' reaction to futuristic technology. In Proc. of International Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 10), PLACE, 153-162.

4.     Agnes Lisowska, Susan Armstrong, Mireille Betrancourt, and Martin Rajman. 2007. Minimizing modality bias when exploring input preferences for multimodal systems in new domains: the archivus case study. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1805-1810. DOI=10.1145/1240866.1240903 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240866.1240903

 

ST 24A: Investigating Secondary Tasks (TBA)

6.     Andreas Sotirakopoulos, Kirstie Hawkey, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2011. On the challenges in usable security lab studies: lessons learned from replicating a study on SSL warnings. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 3 , 18 pages. DOI=10.1145/2078827.2078831 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2078827.2078831

William R. Hazlewood, Erik Stolterman, and Kay Connelly. 2011. Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 877-886. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1979071 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979071

A3 due

 

T12

Tues Dec 6

Receive all outstanding peer feedback, finalize MP2 reports – Khalid will be there to provide feedback/answer any last questions about MP2 deliverables

Last day of winter semester

 

 

Mon Dec 12

Submit any remaining deliverables

 

MP2 submission due on or before Dec 12th (12:00 noon)

 

All Grad seminar research papers due by 12:00 noon (with the exception of those giving seminar on Dec 5th or 6th, must submit before Dec 14th at 12:00 noon)

 

 

 

Topics not covered this semester:

 

Design Process and Tools (submit questions/comments on any 2 of the readings)

25: Prototyping (TBA)

1.     Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 4, Article 18 (December 2010), 24 pages. DOI=10.1145/1879831.1879836 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1879831.1879836

2.     Yang Li and James A. Landay. 2008. Activity-based prototyping of ubicomp applications for long-lived, everyday human activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1303-1312. DOI=10.1145/1357054.1357259 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357259

26A Performance Support Systems (TBA)

1.     Karen L. McGraw. 1997. Defining and designing the performance-centered interface: moving beyond the user-centered interface. interactions 4, 2 (March 1997), 19-26. DOI=10.1145/245129.245131 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/245129.245131

 

27A Google Glass and Privacy (TBA)

1.     Jason Hong. 2013. Considering privacy issues in the context of Google glass. Commun. ACM 56, 11 (November 2013), 10-11. DOI=10.1145/2524713.2524717 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2524713.2524717

2.     Roisin McNaney, John Vines, Daniel Roggen, Madeline Balaam, Pengfei Zhang, Ivan Poliakov, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson's. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2551-2554. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2557092 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557092

 

28A:/B Activity Theory/Distributed Cognition

1.     Jakob Bardram and Afsaneh Doryab. 2011. Activity analysis: applying activity theory to analyze complex work in hospitals. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 455-464. DOI=10.1145/1958824.1958895 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1958824.1958895

2.     David Botta, Kasia Muldner, Kirstie Hawkey, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2011. Toward understanding distributed cognition in IT security management: the role of cues and norms. Cogn. Technol. Work 13, 2 (June 2011), 121-134. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10111-010-0159-y

3.     Eric P.S. Baumer and Bill Tomlinson. 2011. Comparing activity theory with distributed cognition for video analysis: beyond "kicking the tires". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133-142. DOI=10.1145/1978942.1978962 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1978962

Additional Resources:

 

ST 9A: Privacy-enhanced personalization (TBA)

1.     Alfred Kobsa. 2007. Privacy-enhanced personalization. Commun. ACM 50, 8 (August 2007), 24-33. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1278201.1278202

2.     Blase Ur, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Richard Shay, and Yang Wang. 2012. Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 4 , 15 pages. DOI=10.1145/2335356.2335362 (doi)

 

ST 10A: Personalization & Learning (TBA)

1.     Catherine Mulwa, Seamus Lawless, Mary Sharp, Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sanchez, and Vincent Wade. 2010. Adaptive educational hypermedia systems in technology enhanced learning: a literature review. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Information technology education (SIGITE '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73-84. DOI=10.1145/1867651.1867672 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1867651.1867672

2.     Yujie Hong, Lei Shi, and Fangtian Ying. 2013. Hanzi Lamp: an intelligent guide interface for Chinese character learning. In Proceedings of the adjunct publication of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75-76. DOI=10.1145/2508468.2514717 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2508468.2514717

 

ST 14A: Children (Sarita Ayyadevara)

1.     Hilary Browne Hutchinson, Benjamin B. Bederson, and Allison Druin. 2006. The evolution of the international children's digital library searching and browsing interface. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 105-112. (doi)

2.     Allison Druin, Elizabeth Foss, Hilary Hutchinson, Evan Golub, and Leshell Hatley. 2010. Children's roles using keyword search interfaces at home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 413-422. DOI=10.1145/1753326.1753388 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753388

 

ST 15A: Low Vision (TBA)

3.     Matei Negulescu, Jaime Ruiz, Yang Li, and Edward Lank. 2012. Tap, swipe, or move: attentional demands for distracted smartphone input. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '12), Genny Tortora, Stefano Levialdi, and Maurizio Tucci (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173-180. DOI=10.1145/2254556.2254589 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2254556.2254589

4.     Joao Oliveira, Tiago Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Goncalves. 2011. Blind people and mobile touch-based text-entry: acknowledging the need for different flavors. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179-186. DOI=10.1145/2049536.2049569 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2049536.2049569

 

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

ST 20A: Co-located Synchronous (TBA)

1.     Desney S. Tan, Darren Gergle, Regan Mandryk, Kori Inkpen, Melanie Kellar, Kirstie Hawkey, and Mary Czerwinski. 2008. Using job-shop scheduling tasks for evaluating collocated collaboration. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 12, 3 (January 2008), 255-267. DOI=10.1007/s00779-007-0154-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0154-3

2.     Grudin, J. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, Oregon, United States, September 26 - 28, 1988). CSCW '88. ACM, New York, NY, 85-93. (doi)

 

 

ST 20B: Distributed synchronous applications (TBA)

1.     Nelson Wong and Carl Gutwin. 2012. Controlling an avatar's pointing gestures in desktop collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21-30 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2389176.2389180

2.     Rebecca Grinter and Margery Eldridge. 2003. Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 441-448. (doi)

 

 

ST 21A: Asynchronous Applications (TBA)

  1. Jeremy Barksdale, Kori Inkpen, Mary Czerwinski, Aaron Hoff, Paul Johns, Asta Roseway, and Gina Venolia. 2012. Video threads: asynchronous video sharing for temporally distributed teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1101-1104. DOI=10.1145/2145204.2145367 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2145204.2145367
  2. Guang Li, Xiang Cao, Sergio Paolantonio, and Feng Tian. 2012. SketchComm: a tool to support rich and flexible asynchronous communication of early design ideas. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 359-368. DOI=10.1145/2145204.2145261 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2145204.2145261